Blantyre, Malawi

January 8, 2026

Jack Nankhumwa

Unity of Purpose: The Missing Link to Malawi’s Development

As President Arthur Peter Mutharika continues to lead Malawi, he has consistently challenged the nation with a clear and steady vision anchored in order, development, and responsible governance. His determination to build a lasting legacy is evident in both word and action. Central to this mission is the expectation that those entrusted with ministerial responsibility must fully understand, respect, and align themselves with his mandate.

Unfortunately, this is not always the case. Some ministers appear distracted, their attention drifting away from service delivery and toward internal power struggles, with eyes already fixed on the party presidency of 2030. Ambition, while not inherently wrong, becomes destructive when it overshadows discipline, loyalty, and collective purpose.

If only such individuals could temper their haste and focus on the task at hand, they might not only contribute meaningfully now but also remain politically relevant in the years ahead.

Leadership demands wisdom, restraint, and careful use of words. Reckless statements and unnecessary conflicts do not advance national interests; they derail progress. At a time when Malawi requires cohesion and clarity, internal wrangles only weaken government and erode public confidence.

President Mutharika’s love for Malawi is unquestionable. Time and again, he has demonstrated that he is worthy of the trust placed in him. His leadership style—calm, decisive, and development-oriented—stands out as a breath of fresh air in a political environment often clouded by noise and self-interest. His commitment to national progress is not theoretical; it is reflected in tangible actions and long-term thinking. Malawi needs such leadership now more than ever.

The nation stands at a critical crossroads, facing economic pressures, social challenges, and rising public expectations. What Malawi urgently needs are leaders with sober minds—men and women prepared to place national interests above personal ambition. Individuals who can support the President’s vision without being driven by ego, factionalism, or premature succession politics.

History offers a sobering lesson. Politicians who chose personal gain over party unity or national interest often faded into irrelevance. Their names serve as reminders, not inspirations. Where are they now? Malawi cannot afford to repeat such mistakes. Development requires focus, humility, and a shared sense of responsibility.

The country needs more than endless political maneuvering. It needs dedicated individuals committed to a common goal: the transformation of Malawi. Unity of purpose is not a slogan; it is a necessity.

Let us therefore choose collaboration over conflict, service over self, and vision over vanity. Let us put Malawi first. Only through unity in vision and purpose can the nation achieve meaningful progress and lasting prosperity.

Share With:

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp

Comments

Related News

Why the Malawi Congress Party May Struggle to Return to Power

For decades, Malawi’s political landscape has been shaped by the rise and fall of dominant parties, each carrying its own legacy, promises, and shortcomings. Among them, the Malawi Congress Party (MCP) remains one of the most historically significant. However, as Malawi continues to evolve socially, economically, and politically, there is growing debate over whether the MCP can realistically regain national dominance in future elections. This analysis examines key factors that critics argue may continue to limit the MCP’s prospects of returning to power. The MCP’s long rule during the one-party era remains a defining chapter in Malawi’s political history. For many Malawians—particularly older generations—memories of political repression, politically motivated violence against critics, limited freedoms, and centralized authority are still vivid. While the party has repeatedly attempted to rebrand itself as democratic and reform-oriented, critics argue that historical perceptions have proven difficult to erase, especially in an era where democratic values are deeply entrenched. Malawi’s politics has often been influenced by regional voting patterns. Observers note that the MCP has historically enjoyed strong support in specific regions but has struggled to consistently build a broad, cross-regional coalition. In contrast, parties that succeed nationally tend to demonstrate inclusivity, diversity in leadership, and policies that resonate across regional and ethnic lines. Without a clear strategy to expand its appeal nationwide, analysts argue that the MCP risks remaining regionally confined. Internal divisions, factionalism, and leadership disputes have periodically weakened the MCP. Political analysts point out that when a party appears divided or lacks a clear succession plan, voter confidence is undermined. In an increasingly competitive political environment, unity, clarity of vision, and strong grassroots organization are essential for electoral success. Malawi has a youthful population, with a significant proportion of voters born after the one-party era. These young voters are less influenced by liberation-era politics and more concerned with practical issues such as employment, education, entrepreneurship, digital innovation, and good governance. Critics argue that the MCP has struggled to articulate a compelling, forward-looking agenda that speaks directly to these aspirations in a convincing and consistent manner. Where the MCP has held power or significant influence, public expectations have been high. However, like many parties before it, the gap between promises and delivery has attracted criticism. Issues such as economic hardship, governance challenges, and public service delivery continue to shape voter perceptions. In Malawian politics, performance in office often weighs more heavily than rhetoric, and disappointment can quickly translate into electoral backlash. Unlike in the past, Malawi now has a crowded and competitive political field. New alliances, emerging parties, and stronger opposition movements have made it increasingly difficult for any single party to dominate. This pluralism means that voters have more alternatives, and loyalty to one party can no longer be taken for granted. Whether or not the Malawi Congress Party will ever return to power remains a matter for the electorate to decide. However, critics argue that historical baggage, regional limitations, internal challenges, and shifting voter priorities continue to pose significant obstacles. In a rapidly changing Malawi, political survival depends on adaptability, inclusivity, and tangible results—qualities voters increasingly demand from all parties seeking their mandate.

Washington State, USA

How “Wadya Ntoliro” Became a Political Flashpoint in Post-Election Malawi

The phrase “Wadya Ntoliro,” now widely circulated on social media and referenced in satirical music pieces, has become one of the most talked-about political expressions following the 2025 presidential election. The origin of the phrase has been linked to Kondwani Mdoko, a young Malawi Congress Party (MCP) supporter whose influence on campaign messaging has drawn debate across the political divide. The expression gained prominence after former President Lazarus Chakwera was captured on video in Mzuzu, stepping out of the State Lodge and casually said it on camera. At the time, many Malawians questioned what the expression meant and why it had suddenly entered the national political space. Following the decisive 16 September 2025 elections—where Chakwera and the MCP were defeated—the phrase resurfaced online and took on new interpretations, with critics using it to symbolise what they describe as misplaced priorities and ineffective communication during Chakwera’s administration. Political analysts have argued that the incident reflects broader concerns about the party’s campaign strategy during the 2025 polls. Some observers believe the MCP leadership relied too heavily on informal advice from young cadres instead of seasoned political strategists, contributing to mixed messaging and public confusion. Meanwhile, in the post-election period, a separate issue involving the reported theft of four State House security dogs has also generated public commentary. Former State House officer Godfrey Jalale was arrested in connection with the matter, drawing further scrutiny over security management during the previous administration. These incidents have collectively fuelled social media conversations, with artists producing songs referencing “Wadya Ntoliro,” turning the phrase into a cultural symbol of the 2020–2025 political era. Critics of the former administration argue that the spread of the phrase underscores broader concerns about communication gaps, inconsistent decision-making, and internal advisory challenges during Chakwera’s presidency. Supporters of the former president, however, say the phrase has been blown out of proportion and used unfairly for political ridicule following the electoral loss. As the country moves forward under new leadership, the “Wadya Ntoliro” phenomenon remains a reminder of how quickly public communication moments can transform into national talking points—shaping political narratives long after elections are concluded.

Washington State, USA

How MCP Took the Loyalty of Its Members and the Central Region For Granted: Lessons from the 2020 – 2025 Political Cycle

When the Malawi Congress Party (MCP) returned to power in June 2020 through the court-ordered Fresh Presidential Election, the triumph was anchored almost entirely in the unwavering loyalty of the Central Region—particularly Lilongwe and surrounding districts. For nine months, thousands of young people, activists, and party loyalists marched across the country demanding electoral justice. The street demonstrations of 2019–2020 were powered largely by Central Region citizens who viewed Lazarus Chakwera as a symbol of national renewal and democratic hope. Yet five years later, as Malawi approached the 2025 polls, MCP faced a dramatic collapse of enthusiasm among the very people who lifted it to State House. The question remains: What went wrong? This is a story of political miscalculations, regional alienation, controversial appointments, unmet campaign promises, and a widening disconnect between leadership and its loyal base. Between 2019 and 2020, MCP supporters from Lilongwe, Kasungu, Mchinji, Ntchisi, Dedza, and Nkhotakota marched almost daily—risking arrests, tear gas, job losses, and violence demanding nullification of the disputed 2019 election. Yet soon after assuming office in July 2020, President Chakwera made a statement that landed harshly on the ears of those same supporters: “I cannot afford to support each one of you from Nsanje to Chitipa. You send me messages every day threatening me that I have forgotten you.” Across the Central Region, the remark was interpreted as a dismissal of the foot soldiers who had sacrificed for MCP’s return to power. Instead of empowering long-standing MCP members—many of them educated professionals ready to serve—Chakwera was accused of disproportionately appointing individuals from the Malawi Assemblies of God, where he had served as President for 24 years before entering politics. This raised concerns within MCP strongholds that party loyalty had been overlooked in favour of religious networks. The perception of imbalance deepened when nearly 10 cabinet ministers were appointed from Lilongwe alone, leaving Kasungu, Mchinji, Ntchisi, Nkhotakota, and Dedza feeling sidelined. Only Dowa seemed to maintain consistent representation. A party that had long styled itself as “the home of the Central Region” now faced growing criticism from the very districts that built its legacy. Concerns about family influence also escalated. One example frequently raised by critics was the controversial UK trip during the COVID-19 lockdown, where the President travelled with his wife, daughter, and son-in-law—while the Foreign Affairs Minister, who would normally oversee such diplomatic duties, remained at home. Ironically, due to COVID restrictions, Chakwera ended up attending the event virtually. As economic hardship worsened between 2021 and 2023—marked by rising food prices, persistent fuel shortages, severe forex scarcity, and failing public services—the Central Region felt increasingly abandoned. A widely circulated narrative further damaged the administration’s image: allegations that families in Kasiya, the President’s home area, were receiving payouts said to be as high as K830,000 per individual per month. Whether accurate or exaggerated, the perception of selective benefit created a sense of betrayal among suffering communities. Meanwhile, the economy continued to deteriorate. The cost of living soared, basic goods became scarce, and the government struggled to stabilise the kwacha. Many campaign promises—youth jobs, reduced presidential travel, improved governance, and lower cost of living—remained unfulfilled. The disappointment was palpable. The passport crisis of 2022–2024 became a national embarrassment. Passport production nearly collapsed, and speculation—though disputed—linking the President’s son, Nick Chakwera, to passport system contracts intensified public frustration. Even without confirmed evidence, the perception alone was politically destructive. Adding to the national sense of uncertainty was the mysterious death of Vice President Dr. Saulos Klaus Chilima in a plane crash in June 2024. Many Malawians demanded answers that never came, and the unresolved questions deepened national anxiety and political distrust. On the other end of the spectrum, the consequences of earlier political unrest lingered. The killing of a police officer at Nsundwe during the violent 2019 demonstrations remained a reminder of the deep societal wounds that had never fully healed. As for MCP’s once-reliable religious support base, the clergy from Nkhoma Synod, Assemblies of God, and several faith networks that had mobilised heavily in 2020 were visibly absent by 2025. Many privately expressed disappointment in what they perceived as a government that lost direction and violated their expectations of integrity and servant leadership. Chakwera’s selection of Dr. Michael Usi Mumba as running mate for 2025 deepened internal rifts. Senior party officials and grassroots organizers opposed the choice, leading many to quietly withdraw from campaign activities. Ultimately, the campaign trail was spearheaded only by Chakwera, Richard Chimwendo Banda, Jessie Kabwila, and Mumba—while much of the party machinery sat out in silence. In politics, silence is fatal. In the end, MCP’s 2025 defeat underscored a painful reality: parties that ignore their loyal supporters eventually lose them. Highly qualified MCP professionals were overlooked. Trusted cadres felt abandoned. Outsiders occupied influential roles. And millions of disenchanted supporters simply stayed home. The Central Region—once MCP’s impenetrable fortress—sent a message that no political party should ever forget. The lesson is straightforward: Do not sideline loyal members. Do not reward strangers at the expense of your own base. Do not mistake silence for support. Loyalty has an expiry date. Just ask the Malawi Congress Party—and Lazarus Chakwera—who entered the 2025 election counting on their financial muscle, the Central Region, and more than three million registered voters, only to discover that the ground beneath them had shifted.

Washington State, USA

Blantyre City Mayor Without a Classmate: What Isaac Jomo Osman’s Rise Really Means for Malawi

The election of Isaac Jomo Osman as Mayor of Blantyre City has sparked a heated national debate—one that exposes Malawi’s deep-rooted assumptions about education, leadership, and who is “qualified” to govern. While many ordinary citizens celebrate Jomo’s victory as a story of resilience and possibility, a vocal section of self-proclaimed elites insists that the mayor’s lack of formal schooling makes him unfit for office. Yet the criticism misses the larger point: Jomo’s journey is a reminder that leadership is not manufactured in classrooms. It is forged in experience, courage, and service. Jomo’s life story begins far from privilege. A former street kid in Blantyre, he never had the chance to sit in a classroom—an experience his critics often flaunt as their badge of superiority. His early life was spent navigating the streets, working as a call boy in Limbe, and eventually rising to lead his peers through confidence and instinctive leadership. Through sheer determination, he went on to: Establish Mtopwa Stars Football Club Run an orphanage supporting vulnerable children Sponsor a netball team Win the Deputy Mayor position in 2024 Be elected Mayor of Blantyre City in 2025 These are tangible achievements—community-centered, impact-driven, and self-built. Degrees did not create them. Vision did. Those attacking Osman’s educational background forget one fundamental principle of democracy: leadership is chosen by the people, not awarded by academic institutions. If the educated critics believe they are better qualified, they should contest elections—yet few do. Many prefer to participate from the comfort of social media timelines, offering commentary but avoiding the responsibility that comes with serving the public. Democracy does not belong to the educated alone. It belongs to all citizens, regardless of background. The world is full of examples proving that formal education is not the sole path to leadership or innovation. Some of the most successful global figures—including Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, and Richard Branson—rose to prominence without university degrees. They thrived because of creativity, drive, and insight, not diplomas. Even Africa has its examples. Zimbabwe’s self-taught inventor who developed groundbreaking energy and automobile concepts is living proof that genius is not confined to classrooms. Instead of celebrating him, some mock and undermine him—just as some Malawians are doing with Jomo. Jomo’s rise reflects qualities often missing in traditional leaders such as confidence, high self-esteem, fearlessness, connection with grassroots communities, strategic intuition and commitment to youth empowerment. These are traits shaped by real-life struggle—not textbooks. Osman’s election should serve as a national reflection point. It challenges Malawians to rethink narrow definitions of leadership and to recognize that real change often comes from those who have lived the struggles of ordinary people. Leadership requires heart, not just head and the impact requires action, not just theories. Democracy requires participation, not just criticism. Isaac Jomo Osman has transformed his life from street survival to community service and now city leadership. He has built institutions, uplifted youth, and earned public trust—tasks many degree holders have never attempted. Mockery is misplaced. Recognition is overdue. Jomo is not simply a mayor without a classmate. He is a reminder that Malawi’s next generation of leaders may emerge from unlikely places—driven not by paper qualifications, but by purpose, courage, and lived experience. This is not just his victory. It is a lesson for the nation.

Blantyre, Malawi